MEDICAL RECORD
October 22, 1892
THE ESSENTIALS OF A GOOD STETHOSCOPE
BY CHARLES DENISON, A.M., M.D.,
NEW YORK
"I have been promising myself for some time to write
in protest against the frauds of instrument-makers in the manufacture
of the stethoscope which bears my name. My instrument was not
patented, as it should have been, for the purpose of needed regulationas
to the quality of work and reasonableness of price. Therefore
it is essential for an instrument-dealer to order a lot made by
an irresponsible manufacturer, and sell them to unsuspecting medical
men, as the real article, at an unreasonable proceed. This has
been done in two instances in New York, and one in Chicago, to
my knowledge. In consequence, my attention has been called to
the most awkward and imperfect imitations, under the name "The
Denison Stethoscope," and I have been chagrined to see joints
uneven and loose, tubes impervious or partly occluded and especially
the flexible portion made with inflexible rubber tubing, with
no regard whatever to my directions.
In London, Down Brothers have made a pretty [good] instrument,
excepting their poor adjustment of the spring, but in this country
[the USA] George Tiemann & Co. are the only ones whose make
I can recommend. They have come nearer than any other manufacturer
that I know of in following the requirements of a perfect binaural
stethoscope which desiderata I will state as follows:
1st. THE SMOOTH INNER CALIBRE, large size, and gradually decreasing
from the bell to the ear-ending, in imitation of the speaking
tubes used for deaf persons. The law of sound is like that of
light transmission, i.e., the angles of incidence and reflection
are equal; and that transmission is aided by the trumpet-shaped
bell and gradually decreasing size of the smooth inner surface
of the tubes.
2nd. THE CONTINUOUS TRANSMISSION OF SOUND-This must be natural,
so hard rubber or celluloid are preferable to metal for the tubes,
as the latter givesa high pitch and metallic sound tothe sounds
heard. The joint betweent he bells and the main tube, and between
thwe arms and the flexible tubes, are made by the even and perfect
fitting of slightly conical tubesinto each other making the whole
instrument as if of one piece, as far as the transmission of sound
is concerned. Probably the larger part of the sound is transmitted
through the stethoscopic substance than through the hollow cavity.
3rd. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLEXIBLE TUBES- The coiled wire
for these tubes, which lines the usual rubber tubes and is itself
lined with smooth soft rubber, is made to impinge at each end
of each tube against the gutta-percha, so that a nearly perfect
transmission of sound is obtained. This is the part that Tiemann
& Co. alone have succeeded in rightly making, and is is an
important feature of my stethoscope.
4th. THE EAR ENDINGS as lately made are acorn shaped, with
openings so turned as to be directed directly toward the drums
of the ears. This is a compromise from what I wanted, which was
to have the lower and forward side of these tips bulge as to fill
the space behinf the tragus, and leave the hole above and back
immediately in fronmt of the auditiory canal. The difficulty of
fitting variously shaped ears with perfectly adapted ear-tips
is considerable with any other than the even conical pattern,
I thinkm ought to be overcome.
5th. THE SPRING ATTACHMENT to pull together the arms is adjustable
so that all the pressure of the ear-tipe can be obtained that
the listener can stand with comfort. This much pressure is desireable
for perfect transmission of sound.
6th. THE ORDINARY BELL ENDINGS are as follows: The stationary
bell, with slightly flaring rim one and one-eighth inch in diameter,
which is large enough to use in examination of infants and in
the detection of valvular lesions. The medium-sized bell, which
has a rim one and one-half inch in diameter and sufficiently flaring
to give a good impinging surface against the chest, is the size
ordinarily used. The soft rubber bell, rather thin and flexible,
is intended to crowd into the medium sized bell, giving a one-fourth
projecting rim or soft rubber for use on uneven surfaces, as in
much emaciated consumptives.
7th. THE LARGE BELL FOR STETHOSCOPIC PERCUSSION- This is not,
as has been assumed, for use held against the chest-wall, but
for gathering the waves of sound emitted fromt he open mouth during
expiration while forcible percussion is being made over portions
of the lung where softening, bronchiectasis, or excavation is
suspected. The concussion of the air contained in the thorax carried
with it the succession, the cavernous, or the cracked-metal sounds
which accompany the three above-named conditions, and by holding
this large bell two inches from the patient's mouth, and percussing
during expiration, they are distinguished better than can be done
in any other way. Indeed, in thin chested persons with superficial
excavations connected with a main bronchus, the fingernail percussion
will nicely and accurately outline the limits of the excavation.
the cracked-pot or hollow sounds are altered in various ways,
a slushy or succession quality being sometimes imparted to either,
according to the amount of moisture or breaking down of lung tissue
elevated this stethoscopic percussion to a first place in the
are of physical diagnosis. It is certainly coequal with ordinary
percussion, and second, if at all, only to ausclutation.
The test I suggest of a good stethoscope is not, as assumed
by Dr. Valentine in his article in the MEDICAL RECORD of July
16th, to hold the medium sized bell against to face of a watch,
but put the watch on a show -case or table, cover it with the
palm of the hand, then press the bell against the back of the
hand. The clearness with which the working of the machinery is
heard is the criterion of perfection in the instrument. By this
test seven-eighths of the other stethoscopes sold fall short of
their proper utility. I am willing to have my instrument, if properly
made, tried by this testand if anyone will improve on mine as
much as I have improved on the ordinary kind, I will have his
make if it costs $50. I do not believe, however, that there is
room enough in the perfect reproduction of auscultation sounds
for so much improvement, unless it would be a telephonic stethoscope,
which would necessitate and electric battery accompaniment.
Portability and cheapness of construction are not cardinal
points in a good stethoscope. Utility should be considered first,
last, and chiefly. Yet the former points should not be lost sight
of in making my instrument. It should be as short and compact
as flexibility and convenience of use will allow, and should be
proportioned in its different parts as shown in the accompanying
cut."